Eliquis® Cardio News → Telegram

Executive / Ranking Summary

🫀 DOAC и варфарин при ФП или ВТЭ у пациентов с ХБП: свежий мета-анализ

🔥 Главное в 3 пунктах:
- У пациентов с фибрилляцией предсердий (ФП) и ХБП ДОАК значимо снижают риск геморрагического инсульта (RR=0,455; 95% ДИ 0,275–0,752) и больших (особенно внутричерепных) кровотечений (RR=0,604 и RR=0,424 соответственно) по сравнению с варфарином.
- Не выявлено различий по ишемическим инсультам между ДОАК и варфарином у больных с ФП и ХБП.
- У пациентов с ВТЭ на фоне ХБП эффективность и безопасность ДОАК сопоставимы с варфарином; разницы по рецидивам/летальности и крупным кровотечениям нет.

🧪 Контекст: 15 РКИ (16 361 пациент) – системный обзор и мета-анализ прямых сравнения warfarin vs. ДОАК (апиксабан, ривароксабан, др.) у пациентов с ХБП и ФП или ВТЭ.

📍 Практическое значение:
— Для больных с ФП и ХБП ДОАК — предпочтительная стратегия для профилактики инсульта и минимизации риска серьезных кровотечений, включая внутричерепные.
— Для пациентов с ВТЭ на фоне ХБП можно использовать оба подхода в зависимости от клинической ситуации и индивидуальных факторов риска.

🔗 Источник: PubMed | DOI


❓ Вопрос практики: Какой дозы ДОАК придерживаться при продлённой терапии ВТЭ, особенно у пациентов с сопутствующим раком?

✅ Ответ исследования:
Метанализ 5 РКИ (n=8 781): уменьшенная доза ДОАК (апиксабан/ривароксабан) столь же эффективна, как и стандартная, в профилактике рецидива ВТЭ (ОШ 0,94 [0,68–1,29]; p=0,70), но реже вызывает крупные/клинически значимые кровотечения (ОШ 0,71 [0,61–0,82]; p<0,0001). Анализ подтвердил эквивалентность по эффективности у больных с и без онкозаболеваний.

📍 Как применить:
— У пациентов с высоким геморрагическим риском при необходимости длительной антикоагулянтной терапии (в т.ч. при онкологии) можно безопасно снижать дозу ДОАК после первых месяцев приема.
— При выборе периода дозовой коррекции учитывать уровень риска рецидива и кровотечений.

🔗 Источник: PubMed | DOI


🫀 Интракраниальные кровоизлияния при антикоагулянтной терапии у пациентов с опухолями мозга: что выбрать?

🧪 Что изучали: Метаанализ 10 ретроспективных когортных исследований (n=1 572) — пациенты с первичными или метастатическими опухолями мозга, получавшие ДОАК (апиксабан и др.) или НМГ.

📈 Ключевые результаты:
— Риск любого внутричерепного кровоизлияния при ДОАК был в 2 раза ниже, чем при НМГ (ОР=0,50 [0,29–0,87]; p=0,01).
— Наибольшее снижение риска отмечено у пациентов с первичными опухолями мозга (ОР=0,20 [0,08–0,54]).

📍 Что это меняет на практике:
— ДОАК становятся разумным, безопасным выбором у пациенток с опухолями мозга и нуждающихся в антикоагуляции, особенно при первичных ЦНС-новообразованиях.
— Тем не менее, данные ограничены ретроспективными исследованиями и требуют подтверждения в РКИ.

🔗 Источник: PubMed | DOI

1. A Sole Case of Concurrent Arterial and Venous Thromboses with Massive Pulmonary Embolism and Carriage of Four Genetic Polymorphisms: Factor V Leiden, PAI-1 4G/5G, MTHFR C677T, and ACE I/D-A Case Report.

title

A Sole Case of Concurrent Arterial and Venous Thromboses with Massive Pulmonary Embolism and Carriage of Four Genetic Polymorphisms: Factor V Leiden, PAI-1 4G/5G, MTHFR C677T, and ACE I/D-A Case Report

journal

Reports (MDPI)

publication_date

2025-09-22

doi

10.3390/reports8030167

pmid

40981125

abstract

{'background_and_clinical_significance': 'Arterial and venous thromboses are typically distinct clinical entities, each governed by unique pathophysiological mechanisms. The concurrent manifestation of both, particularly in the setting of massive pulmonary embolism (PE), is exceptionally rare and poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.', 'case_presentation': 'A 61-year-old male with well-controlled hypertension and type 2 diabetes developed extensive thromboses involving deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the right popliteal vein, arterial thrombosis of the left iliac artery, and massive PE. Initial conservative management followed ESC 2019 Guidelines for Acute PE due to absence of hemodynamic instability, utilizing unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), and adjunctive therapy. Failed percutaneous revascularization and persistent arterial occlusion necessitated surgical thromboendarterectomy (TEA). Post hoc genetic testing was initiated due to the atypical and severe presentation with absence of classical provoking factors. Four thrombophilia-associated polymorphisms were identified: heterozygous Factor V Leiden (FVL; R506Q genotype), PAI-1 (4G/5G genotype), MTHFR (c.677C>T genotype), and homozygous ACE I/D (DD genotype).', 'conclusions': 'While each variant has been individually associated with thrombotic risk, their co-occurrence in a single patient with simultaneous arterial and venous thromboses has not, to our knowledge, been previously documented. This case highlights the potential for gene-gene interactions to amplify thrombotic risk, even when variants are considered to confer only modest or moderate risk individually. The report underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach and draws attention to questions of pharmacogenetics, anticoagulation, and future research into cumulative genetic risk in complex thrombotic phenotypes.'}

patient_characteristics

{'age': 61, 'sex': 'male', 'medical_history': ['well-controlled hypertension', 'type 2 diabetes']}

clinical_findings

{'thromboses': ['deep vein thrombosis (right popliteal vein)', 'arterial thrombosis (left iliac artery)', 'massive pulmonary embolism']}

management

{'initial_therapy': ['unfractionated heparin (UFH)', 'low-molecular-weight heparin', 'direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)', 'adjunctive therapy'], 'reason_for_conservative_management': 'absence of hemodynamic instability', 'subsequent_intervention': ['surgical thromboendarterectomy (TEA) due to failed percutaneous revascularization and persistent arterial occlusion']}

genetic_findings

[{'polymorphism': 'Factor V Leiden', 'genotype': 'heterozygous (R506Q)'}, {'polymorphism': 'PAI-1', 'genotype': '4G/5G'}, {'polymorphism': 'MTHFR', 'genotype': 'c.677C>T'}, {'polymorphism': 'ACE I/D', 'genotype': 'homozygous DD'}]

provoking_factors

None (no trauma, surgery, malignancy, or antiphospholipid syndrome)

implications

['Potential amplification of thrombotic risk via gene-gene interactions', 'Importance of multidisciplinary approach', 'Highlights questions of pharmacogenetics and anticoagulation', 'Suggests need for future research into cumulative genetic risk in complex thrombotic phenotypes']

Journal: Reports (MDPI)
Impact Factor:
Date: 2025/9/22
PMID: 40981125
DOI: 10.3390/reports8030167

2. Accelerated Apixaban Removal by Using the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) Albumin Hemodialysis System-A Case Report.

title

Accelerated Apixaban Removal by Using the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) Albumin Hemodialysis System-A Case Report

journal

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports

publication_date

2024-07-01

doi

10.1055/a-2682-8640

pmid

40959463

abstract

In patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), emergency surgery is characterized by the occurrence of a massively increased tendency to bleed. Currently, there is no approved antidote for postoperative patients, making specific therapy challenging in these situations. Emergency surgery was required for a 72-year-old male patient who was in cardiogenic shock due to severe aortic regurgitation resulting from acute prosthetic valve endocarditis. Due to atrial fibrillation, the patient was on apixaban, a factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor anticoagulant, until surgery. We used the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) albumin hemodialysis system postoperatively to treat persisting shock with multi-organ failure, acidosis, and DOAC removal. Serial drug-level measurements revealed strongly accelerated apixaban clearance. In line with this, we observed only moderate drainage losses. ADVOS accelerates the removal of apixaban and is a promising therapy for preventing bleeding complications in patients receiving DOAC therapy after emergency surgery.

authors

[]

keywords

[]

study_type

case report

patient_demographics

{'age': 72, 'sex': 'male'}

clinical_conditions

['prosthetic valve endocarditis', 'cardiogenic shock', 'severe aortic regurgitation', 'atrial fibrillation', 'multi-organ failure', 'acidosis']

interventions

['apixaban (prior to surgery)', 'ADVOS albumin hemodialysis system (postoperative)']

outcomes

['strongly accelerated apixaban clearance', 'only moderate drainage losses observed', 'suggested reduction in bleeding risk']

conclusions

['ADVOS system accelerates apixaban removal in emergency postoperative patients', 'ADVOS is a promising therapy to prevent bleeding complications in DOAC-treated patients requiring emergency surgery']

Journal: The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon reports
Impact Factor:
Date: 2024/7/1
PMID: 40959463
DOI: 10.1055/a-2682-8640

3. Efficacy and safety of reduced-dose versus full-dose direct oral anticoagulants for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and reconstructed time-to-event data.

title

Efficacy and safety of reduced-dose versus full-dose direct oral anticoagulants for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis and reconstructed time-to-event data.

journal

Thrombosis Research

publication_date

2025-06-25

impact_factor

5.05

quartile

Q1

doi

10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109476

pmid

40957133

registration_number

CRD420251048675

objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced-dose versus full-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment.

methods

{'study_design': 'Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis and reconstructed time-to-event data', 'data_sources': 'Major electronic databases through April 2025', 'study_selection': 'RCTs comparing reduced-dose versus full-dose DOACs for VTE treatment', 'statistical_methods': ['Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models', 'Time-to-event data reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves', 'Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA)'], 'number_of_trials': 5, 'total_participants': 8781}

results

{'efficacy': {'recurrent_vte': {'risk_ratio': 0.94, 'ci': '0.68-1.29', 'p_value': 0.7}, 'hr_time_to_event': 0.89, 'ci_time_to_event': '0.78-1.02', 'p_value_time_to_event': 0.1}, 'safety': {'major_or_clinically_relevant_non_major_bleeding': {'risk_ratio': 0.71, 'ci': '0.61-0.82', 'p_value': '<0.0001'}, 'hr_time_to_event': 0.61, 'ci_time_to_event': '0.57-0.66', 'p_value_time_to_event': '<0.001'}, 'all_cause_mortality': 'No differences observed', 'subgroups': ['Consistent results in patients with and without active cancer', 'Consistent results across DOAC types (apixaban and rivaroxaban)'], 'tsa': 'Sufficient evidence for both efficacy and safety outcomes'}

conclusion

Reduced-dose DOACs are as effective as full-dose regimens in preventing recurrent VTE, with a better safety profile, suggesting they may be preferred for patients requiring extended anticoagulation, particularly those at high risk of recurrence.

Journal: Thrombosis research
Impact Factor: 5.05
Date: 2025/6/25
PMID: 40957133
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2025.109476

4. Intracranial Hemorrhage With Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Brain Tumors: A Review and Meta-Analysis.

title

Intracranial Hemorrhage With Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Brain Tumors: A Review and Meta-Analysis

journal

Neurology

publication_date

2025-09-16

impact_factor

4.57

quartile

Q1

doi

10.1212/WNL.0000000000214140

pmid

40953341

objective

Evaluate the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on the development of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with brain tumors.

methods

{'databases': ['MEDLINE', 'Embase', 'Web of Science', 'Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials'], 'search_period': '2010-01 to 2025-06', 'study_types': ['randomized-controlled trials', 'cohort studies'], 'population': 'Adults (≥18 years) with primary or metastatic brain tumors receiving therapeutic DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, betrixaban, dabigatran) vs LMWH (enoxaparin, dalteparin, nadroparin, tinzaparin)', 'exclusions': ['studies with prophylactic dosing', 'non-brain tumor patients'], 'outcome': 'Development of ICH', 'analysis': 'Pooled risk ratios (RRs) using restricted random-effects model, heterogeneity and bias analysis, prespecified subgroups and sensitivity analyses', 'registration': 'PROSPERO (CRD42025635334)'}

results

{'studies_included': 10, 'design': 'Retrospective cohort studies', 'total_patients': 1572, 'doac_patients': 645, 'lmwh_patients': 895, 'age_range_doac': '60.4-67', 'age_range_lmwh': '53-64', 'follow_up_duration_months': '3-12', 'main_outcome': {'ich_any': {'doac_vs_lmwh': {'RR': 0.5, 'CI_95': '0.29-0.87', 'p': 0.01, 'I2': 49.5}}}, 'subgroup_3months': {'studies': 3, 'RR': 0.23, 'CI_95': '0.09-0.57', 'p': '<0.01', 'I2': '<0.01'}, 'stratified': {'primary_brain_tumors': {'studies': 5, 'RR': 0.2, 'CI_95': '0.08-0.54', 'p': '<0.01', 'I2': '<0.01'}, 'metastatic_brain_tumors': {'studies': 5, 'RR': 0.86, 'CI_95': '0.44-1.68', 'p': 0.66, 'I2': 36.04}}, 'sensitivity_analyses': {'leave_one_out': 'robustness confirmed', 'cumulative_meta_analysis': 'stable estimates with narrowing CIs'}, 'publication_bias': {'egger_p': 0.19, 'begg_p': 0.59, 'evidence': 'none'}}

conclusion

DOACs were associated with significantly lower ICH risk than LMWH in anticoagulated brain tumor patients, particularly with primary brain tumors. Findings support DOACs as a safe anticoagulant for arterial and venous thromboembolism but warrant cautious interpretation due to study design limitations.

Journal: Neurology
Impact Factor: 4.57
Date: 2025/9/16
PMID: 40953341
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000214140

5. Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in the treatment of chronic kidney disease with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

title

Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in the treatment of chronic kidney disease with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

journal

Frontiers in Pharmacology

publication_date

2025-04-21

impact_factor

5.35

quartile

Q1

doi

10.3389/fphar.2025.1615284

pmid

40949128

objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).

methods

{'data_sources': ['PubMed', 'Embase', 'Web of Science', 'Cochrane Library', 'ClinicalTrials.gov'], 'search_date': 'up to 2024-06-30', 'inclusion_criteria': 'RCTs assessing efficacy and safety of warfarin and DOACs in CKD with AF or VTE', 'outcomes': {'CKD+VTE': ['thrombosis recurrence or VTE-related deaths', 'major bleeding'], 'CKD+AF': ['stroke or systemic embolism', 'major bleeding']}, 'bias_assessment_tool': "Cochrane Collaboration's tool", 'studies_screened': 540, 'studies_included': 15, 'total_participants': 16361}

results

{'CKD_AF': {'DOACs_vs_warfarin_hemorrhagic_stroke': {'RR': 0.455, 'CI_95': '0.275-0.752', 'p_value': 0.002, 'effect': 'DOACs reduced risk'}, 'DOACs_vs_warfarin_ischemic_stroke': {'difference': 'not significant'}, 'DOACs_vs_warfarin_major_bleeding': {'RR': 0.604, 'CI_95': '0.442-0.825', 'p_value': 0.002, 'effect': 'DOACs reduced risk'}, 'DOACs_vs_warfarin_intracranial_bleeding': {'RR': 0.424, 'CI_95': '0.287-0.626', 'p_value': '<0.001', 'effect': 'DOACs reduced risk'}}, 'CKD_VTE': {'DOACs_vs_warfarin_recurrent_VTE_or_death': {'RR': 0.663, 'CI_95': '0.409-1.073', 'p_value': 0.094, 'effect': 'no significant difference'}, 'DOACs_vs_warfarin_major_bleeding': {'RR': 0.543, 'CI_95': '0.209-1.407', 'p_value': 0.208, 'effect': 'no significant difference'}}}

conclusion

DOACs demonstrate superior efficacy and safety compared to warfarin in patients with AF and CKD, while in VTE with CKD, DOACs show similar efficacy and safety to warfarin.

clinical_trials_registration

{'url': 'http://www.clinicaltrials.gov', 'identifier': 'CRD42024510727'}

Journal: Frontiers in pharmacology
Impact Factor: 5.35
Date: 2025/4/21
PMID: 40949128
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1615284