MedicalAdviser'sGroupMAGCongress Intelligence
Congress Intelligence · EASD 2026 · special feature

China's incretin pipeline, seen from EASD 2026

Twenty Chinese-origin molecules were presented in Milan: oral GLP-1s, dual and triple agonists, amylin, monthly dosing, weekly insulins. Eight of the families already carry a licence from Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, AstraZeneca or Regeneron. The next wave of competition is in the abstract book.

0Chinese-origin molecules tracked
0presented at EASD 2026, in 0 abstracts
0licensing deals with Western pharma since Nov 2023, headline value $0
2already approved in China: mazdutide, ecnoglutide
← Back to the main EASD 2026 report
Today against tomorrow

Ten incretin molecules on the market. Twenty-five Chinese candidates behind them.

Each square is one molecule. The market today is six molecules sold worldwide plus four approved only in China; the Chinese pipeline shown at EASD alone is more than twice that. Behind it, L.E.K. Consulting counted 60–70 Chinese pipeline assets in phase 2 or later as of February 2025, about half of them for weight management, plus 15–20 semaglutide biosimilar programmes.

Marketed = approved for diabetes or obesity in at least one major market, 1 Oct 2026

On the market today: 10

Worldwide: exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, tirzepatideChina only: beinaglutide, PEG-loxenatide, mazdutide, ecnoglutide

Chinese-origin candidates tracked here: 25

Presented at EASD 2026 (20)Licensed but not at EASD (5)

Behind these, 60–70 Chinese assets were in phase 2 or later in February 2025 (L.E.K.). Biosimilars of liraglutide and semaglutide are not counted here.

Where they stand

Mechanism against stage

Each cell counts molecules; click a cell to list them in the table below. Stage is the highest reached anywhere, as disclosed publicly.

Status as of 1 October 2026
Mechanism classes: GLP-1 single agonists (including Fc fusions and biased agonists), GLP-1/GIP or GLP-1/glucagon dual agonists, triple agonists, amylin, oral small molecules, semaglutide follow-ons, weekly insulins.
The molecules

Who makes what, and who bought it

Filter by mechanism, stage or partner. Abstract numbers open the entry on the congress platform.

Mechanism
Show
MoleculeMechanism · dosingStageWestern partner · dealAt EASD 2026
What sets them apart

Six patterns in the Chinese programmes

Read across the 31 abstracts and the public status, the Chinese molecules do not just copy the leaders. Six features recur, each with the abstracts behind it.

Where the Western pipeline stands on the same features

FeatureChinese programmes at EASD 2026Western comparators
Oral small-molecule GLP-1 with phase 3 doneHRS-7535: two phase 3 trials, filing accepted in ChinaOrforglipron (Lilly): phase 3 complete, filings in 2026; elecoglipron (AZ, ex-Eccogene) entering phase 3
Once-weekly oralHRS-1596 (preclinical, licensed to Novo); oral ecnoglutide VRB-101 (phase 2b, Verdiva)No once-weekly oral incretin in late development
Dosing every two weeks or monthlyRAY1225 (two-weekly, phase 3); bofanglutide (up to monthly, phase 3); ASC35/ASC36 (monthly, phase 1)MariTide (Amgen, monthly, phase 3); CagriSema and tirzepatide weekly
Triple agonistsUBT251 (phase 2, Novo), HRS-4729 (phase 1), XTL6001 (MasR, phase 1), DD1013 (amylin triple, preclinical)Retatrutide (Lilly, phase 3 reported this week); UBT251 is now also Novo's
Active comparators in registration trialsUBT251 vs semaglutide; TG103 vs dulaglutide; HRS-7535 vs dapagliflozin; HDM1702 equivalence vs Wegovy; HDM1005 vs dulaglutidePlacebo-controlled pivotal programmes with separate head-to-head trials (SURPASS-2, SURMOUNT-5)
Weekly insulin and fixed-ratio combinationsGZR4 superior to degludec and glargine; GZR102 (GZR4 + bofanglutide); SHR-3167 phase 1/2Icodec (Novo, approved outside the USA), efsitora (Lilly); IcoSema
The buyers

Eight deals in under three years

Upfront payments (orange) against headline totals including milestones (blue), in millions of US dollars. Headline totals are what the companies announced; most of each is contingent.

Licensing of Chinese-origin incretin assets

Verdiva–Sciwind: financial terms of the licence were not disclosed; Verdiva launched with a $411M Series A.

Reading the deals

Four of the eight assets were preclinical or phase 1 when licensed: buyers are paying for chemistry (oral small molecules, once-weekly oral peptides) rather than for clinical data.

The two largest buyers are the two incumbents. Novo Nordisk has bought a triple agonist and an oral weekly dual agonist; Lilly already holds mazdutide outside China. Merck, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Regeneron each entered obesity through a Chinese molecule.

Hengrui alone accounts for two of the eight deals and the single largest headline figure, and brought five clinical programmes to Milan.

Headline values overstate cash: upfront payments across the seven disclosed deals total about $1.1B against $18B announced.
What Milan showed

Five results to remember

Numbers as published in the abstracts; late-breaking data only after presentation.

Global headquarters

Oral small molecules and once-weekly oral peptides are the asset class being bought. Expect head-to-head claims against semaglutide and tirzepatide from Chinese phase 2 and 3 programmes within two years, first in China, then via the licensees.

Reimbursed markets

Semaglutide follow-ons with phase 3 equivalence data exist already. Payers will reference Chinese pricing in negotiations well before any follow-on is registered locally.

Self-pay markets

In markets where incretins are bought out of pocket, Chinese-made GLP-1s arrive through parallel channels first. The medical question is which product has equivalence data and which does not.

Sources

Where each statement comes from

EASD results: congress abstract book, retrieved 1 October 2026; abstract numbers link to the platform (title public, full text behind the congress login). Deal terms and regulatory status: company releases and trade press, accessed 1 October 2026.