Evidence Scanner
Website Blog
← Docs home

vedolizumab PubMed monitoring Monitoring

  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-10-30 09:13
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-10-31 08:10
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-10-31 09:57
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-01 08:10
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-08 08:02
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-15 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-22 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-29 08:05
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-06 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-13 08:05
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-20 08:10
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-27 08:07
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-03 08:06
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-10 08:04
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-17 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-24 08:02
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-31 08:12
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-02-07 08:14
  1. Docs
  2. vedolizumab PubMed monitoring Monitoring
  3. vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-13 08:05
Evidence Scanner:
vedolizumab PubMed monitoring
Abstracts analysis summary

🫀 Thromboembolic and Cardiovascular Risk in UC on Advanced Therapy: Vedolizumab Data

🔥 Main in 3 points


  • Vedolizumab users with ulcerative colitis had a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cardiovascular events (CVEs) than those on TNF inhibitors.
  • Tofacitinib (5mg/10mg BID) showed no significant VTE/CVE signal compared to TNF inhibitors; 5-ASA use reduced VTE risk.
  • Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rates were similar across advanced therapies.

🧪 Context


Retrospective cohort, Japanese claims data; 8125 TNFi, 2469 vedolizumab, 1218 tofacitinib users evaluated for VTEs, CVEs, MACEs after therapy initiation.

📍 Practical significance


In ulcerative colitis patients needing advanced therapy, vedolizumab appears particularly suitable when cardiovascular/thrombotic risk is a concern. 5-ASA co-use may further reduce VTE risk. Consider cardiovascular profile alongside efficacy when selecting biologics.

🔗 Source — PubMed | DOI


❓ Does switching UC/CD patients to a second TNFi increase risk for de-novo immune-mediated inflammatory diseases compared to switching to vedolizumab/ustekinumab?

✅ Study answer


In a matched real-world cohort (n=14,360), switching to a second TNFi resulted in a significantly higher incidence of new-onset IMIDs (10.8% vs 6.9%; adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.37-1.79) versus those switched to vedolizumab or ustekinumab, for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.

📍 How to apply


Consider vedolizumab or ustekinumab over a second TNFi for IBD patients with prior TNFi exposure—especially in patients at risk for additional IMIDs. Individualise therapy choice using comorbid risk profiles and prior history.

🔗 Source — PubMed | DOI


🧾 Predicting Vedolizumab Persistence in UC: Importance of Endoscopic Response at 24 Weeks

✅ Do


  • Assess endoscopic response (Mayo subscore) at 24 weeks in all UC patients on vedolizumab.
  • Prioritise maintenance strategies for those with early endoscopic improvement.

⚠️ With caution


  • Co-administering immunomodulators or 5-ASA may not significantly change vedolizumab persistence outcomes.

🚫 Avoid


  • Relying solely on clinical remission without endoscopic monitoring to predict long-term response.

🔗 Source — PubMed | DOI

Medical Advisers's Group
MAG | Medical Adviser’s Group, France
Contact:
mdwrt.com
+33 6 32 14 87 09
yakov@mdwrt.com
Unsubscribe from the newsletter
                                                           

On This Page