Evidence Scanner
Website Blog
← Docs home

vedolizumab PubMed monitoring Monitoring

  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-10-30 09:13
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-10-31 08:10
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-10-31 09:57
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-01 08:10
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-08 08:02
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-15 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-22 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-11-29 08:05
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-06 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-13 08:05
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-20 08:10
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2025-12-27 08:07
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-03 08:06
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-10 08:04
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-17 08:03
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-24 08:02
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-01-31 08:12
  • vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-02-07 08:14
  1. Docs
  2. vedolizumab PubMed monitoring Monitoring
  3. vedolizumab PubMed monitoring – 2026-02-07 08:14
Evidence Scanner:
vedolizumab PubMed monitoring
Abstracts analysis summary

🫀 Comparative safety of advanced therapies in Crohn's disease: no signal for increased VTE

🔥 Main in 3 points

  • No significant differences in risk of serious infections, VTE, or MACE across TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, and upadacitinib in CD.
  • VTE rates were low (0.90–2.33 per 100 person-years; no agent had a statistically higher risk).
  • Supports deciding between advanced therapies based on efficacy, not differential safety signals.

🧪 Context


Retrospective comparative effectiveness study (n=12,245; OptumLabs claims, US; 2016–2024) using multinomial propensity scoring; compared risk across 5 biologics/JAK inhibitors for patients with CD.

📍 Practical significance

When treating Crohn’s disease with advanced therapies—including vedolizumab—concerns about VTE or major CV events should not drive therapy choice. Select agents primarily on comparative clinical efficacy and patient factors.

🔗 Source — PubMed | doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.57922


🧩 Predicting vedolizumab response in UC: machine learning models emerging

🔥 Main in 3 points

  • Vedolizumab remains a key agent for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis; RCTs confirm efficacy.
  • 20–40% of patients may show primary non-response—need for precision strategies.
  • Machine learning models (AUC up to 0.82) are showing promise in predicting response.

🧪 Context


Synthesis of major RCTs & meta-analyses (GEMINI 1, VARSITY) and AI predictive modelling literature.

📍 Practical significance

Using AI-driven prediction (e.g., neural networks using clinical, lab and tissue data) may help identify UC patients more likely to respond to vedolizumab, reduce ineffective cycling, and optimise precision selection.

🔗 Source — PubMed | doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001208


❓ Can immunophenotyping help guide vedolizumab selection in UC?

✅ Study answer


Prospective phase 4 study (n=11): Patients with a higher baseline proportion of CD161+ memory CD4+ T cells in inflamed colorectal tissue had greater likelihood of long-term remission at week 54 with vedolizumab (48.5% vs 31.3%; p=0.0303).

📍 How to apply

Consider that T cell immunophenotype assessment in tissue may become a tool to stratify patients for vedolizumab therapy, improving remission rates and personalisation. Still investigational, but increasingly supported by mechanistic and translational evidence.

🔗 Source — PubMed | doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340271

Medical Advisers's Group
MAG | Medical Adviser’s Group, France
Contact:
mdwrt.com
+33 6 32 14 87 09
yakov@mdwrt.com
Unsubscribe from the newsletter
                                                           

On This Page